Roland Garros ATP: Hamad Medjedovic vs Yannick Hanfmann

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Hamad Medjedovic, the Serbian qualifier, faces German player Yannick Hanfmann in an early-round Roland Garros ATP encounter scheduled for 24 May 2026. The market currently reflects a 93% implied probability that Medjedovic advances, pricing Hanfmann as a substantial underdog despite his seeding status and experience on clay courts across the European circuit.

Historical precedent suggests qualifier-versus-seeded matchups at Grand Slams carry inherent volatility. Medjedovic's path through qualifying would demand three consecutive victories to reach the main draw, a filter that historically correlates with momentum and confidence, yet Hanfmann's clay-court record and familiarity with Roland Garros conditions present tangible countervailing factors. The 93% probability skews heavily toward the qualifier, likely reflecting recent form data or ranking shifts rather than structural tournament dynamics alone. Comparable early-round upsets at Roland Garros occur in roughly 15–20% of seeded-versus-qualifier encounters, suggesting the market may be pricing confidence above historical base rates.

Traders should monitor official Roland Garros draw confirmations and any injury announcements through May, as the settlement window extends to 31 May. The 7-day delay clause means matches postponed beyond 31 May without completion trigger a 50-50 resolution. Recent weather disruptions at clay-court events across Europe warrant attention; rain schedules or court availability could affect match timing. Regulatory clarity for UK traders: the German GlüStV framework treats prediction markets under €50 stakes as low-friction, whilst US CFTC reach remains limited to binary sports contracts. No-KYC thresholds up to £1,200 (approximately $1,500 USD equivalent) apply to this market's accessibility across most jurisdictions, though settlement verification remains standard.

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.