Plovdiv: Tommaso Compagnucci vs Maxim Mrva

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Tommaso Compagnucci and Maxim Mrva are set to meet in the Plovdiv Challenger on clay, a first-round match that is the real-world event behind this market. The crowd price at 100% YES implies the market is treating Compagnucci as effectively certain to advance, but the settlement still depends on the match being played and producing a clear winner rather than a cancellation or unresolved delay.

That kind of pricing is best read against the usual volatility of lower-tier ATP Challenger tennis, where late withdrawals, walkovers and schedule shifts are more common than on the main tour. SuperTennis reported Compagnucci drawing Mrva, the No 2 seed, which explains why the match attracted attention despite the lopsided market price.[5] Comparable listings also place the match on 22 June in Plovdiv, confirming that the scheduled meeting has been widely carried by live-score and tennis databases.[1][3][6]

From a market-access angle, the regulatory frame matters as much as the draw. In Germany, GlüStV rules can affect whether a prediction market is treated as gambling-like activity and therefore how access, limits and compliance checks are handled. In the US, CFTC reach is relevant where a platform or participant is within the Commission’s jurisdiction, even if the market itself is overseas-facing. For users, “no-KYC up to $1,500” means smaller participation can typically proceed without identity verification, but once activity crosses that threshold, or triggers risk controls, additional checks may be required; that affects how easily a trader can scale into a market like this one.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Tax UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Tax UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.