Geneva Open: Edas Butvilas vs Alexander Bublik

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Edas Butvilas is due to play Alexander Bublik in the Geneva Open round of 16 on clay in Switzerland, with the market set on whether Butvilas or Bublik advances. The crowd has priced it at 0% YES, which is notably detached from the tennis market consensus in the live odds and previews: Butvilas entered off an upset of Lorenzo Sonego in the first round, but Bublik remains the higher-ranked and strongly favoured player. Recent previews from Bleacher Nation and Lines.com put Bublik around the low- to mid-80s in implied win probability, while the ATP score centre lists the fixture as a live round-of-16 match in Geneva.

For framing, the relevant comparator is the usual gap between a qualifier or low-ranked player and a top-10 opponent on clay: upsets happen, but markets generally reprice quickly after one surprise win rather than assuming a deeper run. The regulatory context also matters. In Germany, the GlüStV regime can affect access to betting-style products through local compliance and advertising rules, while US-facing users should note that CFTC-linked enforcement and platform restrictions can apply where a market is treated as a derivatives product rather than a simple opinion poll. “No-KYC up to $1,500” means smaller activity may be possible without identity checks, but it is not a blanket guarantee of access; thresholds, jurisdiction filters and funding limits still determine whether a user can actually participate in this market.

The main catalysts are administrative rather than tactical: whether the match is started on schedule, whether there is a court or weather delay, and whether either player withdraws before completion. Sofascore and Flashscore both list the match for 20 May 2026, and the ATP live stats page indicates the round-of-16 slot is active. If the match is not played, ends level, or is pushed beyond the seven-day settlement window without a winner, the market resolves 50-50; if it starts but is not finished, the advancing player matters most.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.